decentralized clinical trials
Over the last decade, an important change in the approach to clinical trials has taken place, marking an incipient shift from traditional to decentralized trials. The first such initiative came in 2011, when Pfizer conducted a pilot decentralized study during an investigation of a new drug using smartphone- and web-based technology to collect patient data. In the last two years as the COVID-19 pandemic has limited on-site access, decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have gained force, and it seems that this will be the main approach for future human clinical trials. Here, we will compare DCTs with traditional clinical trials (TCTs) and look at the factors that are driving the demand for DCTs, as well as considering the technical, logistical, and regulatory challenges faced by DCTs today.
DCTs, also known as “virtual” studies, can improve trials by guaranteeing interactions between physicians and patients as well as increasing the recruiting power of a diverse public and reducing withdrawal rates. There are many virtual technologies now available to enable DCTs. Depending on the type of study, investigators can choose from among telemedicine, wearable medical devices such as biometric sensors, other sensory-based technologies, home visits, and direct delivery of study drugs and materials to patients’ homes. Thus, clinical trials can be conducted either by investigators utilizing these virtual technologies or by trial participants themselves.
DCTs are smaller, fleeter, less costly, and more diverse than TCTs, principally due to their advantages in recruiting patients. Treatment and patient follow-up are also steps for which DCTs offer advantages. Below, we provide a side-by-side comparison between a traditional and decentralized clinical trial:
Clinical study stage | Traditional | Decentralized |
---|---|---|
Patient recruiting | Doctors’ indications, social media advertising, and researcher center advertising | Digital advertising using ads or digital kiosks |
Participant consent | In-person consent signature | Electronic consent signature (e-consent) |
Screening | In-person physical exams | Electronic health record (e-screener) |
Enrollment | In-person enrollment | Electronic enrollment |
Treatment and follow-up | On-site treatment | Self-treatment or mobile healthcare providers |
Retention | Scheduling in-person visits | Telemedicine |
End of study | After the last in-person visit | Returning study equipment |
At the time of publication, there are 69 decentralized clinical trials being conducted, ranging from observational to interventional studies. A few notable example include:
Moreover, there are more than 148 companies that provide digital health platforms to deliver solutions for companies to run a decentralized or hybrid clinical trial. For example, Halo Health Systems produces technological systems to coordinate trial sites, monitor patient safety, and assist active trials, while Right at Home focuses on providing home care services for older patients and individuals affected by poor mobility.
Anju Software is another company providing a platform for clinical trial management with a range of enhanced trial efficiency capabilities that includes the company’s technology for facilitating the reuse of edit checks for flagging inaccurate data across multiple clinical trials.
Increasing adherence to decentralized clinical trials is expected for the next few years. By the end of 2022, an increase of 28% is estimated, compared to 2021, and by the end of 2032, the market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of almost 7%. This is because virtual interventions have numerous benefits over conventional trials, such as the reduction of recruitment timelines by 30–50% and a 90% increase in retention rates.
The success of a DCT will depend on the commitment of the investigators, because the challenges for introducing DCTs involve aspects that could influence the quality of clinical trials. As pharmaceutical companies must deliver validated results for approval by regulatory agencies, it is vital to ensure the technical quality of the electronic apps, making sure they are able to generate reproducible signals. In addition, investigators must receive technical support to ensure their capability to use different electronic platforms to monitor their patients. The patients themselves must also feel comfortable enough to participate through phone or video calls. Finally, the DCT must be in compliance with each regulatory agency involved in the study.
Imagine, for a moment, that you are standing not in a gleaming Silicon Valley office…
The One Big Beautiful Bill (BBB) is reshaping how industry leaders think about innovation, investment,…
A few years back, the only people who could train computers to make predictions or…
EV buyers are no longer loyal to brands. Instead, they are loyal to performance. This…
With nearly 40% of global plastic waste originating from packaging, reducing this waste has become…
The cement industry is the second-largest contributor to global CO2 emissions, lagging only behind the…