Clinker’s carbon problem and the search for solutions
Clinker production is carbon-intensive, emitting 0.83 tons of CO2 per ton produced. Although clinker constitutes only about 10% of the total mass of concrete, it is responsible for over 90% of its carbon footprint.
The decarbonization reaction (calcination) during clinker production, combined with the energy-intensive nature of the process, justifies why clinker must be the primary target for emission reduction during cement production.
Reducing clinker usage involves substituting it with Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs), which are mineral additions used as a partial replacement for Portland cement. Conventional SCMs, such as fly ash and blast furnace slag, offer significant advantages in lowering CO2 emissions and reducing production costs. Yet, their availability remains constrained, and they can only meet 15% of the demand for cement.
Fly ash and blast furnace slag are produced as byproducts of the coal power and steel industries. These industries are transitioning to cleaner production technologies, making the availability of the byproducts scarce. Therefore, the focus shifts to developing newer, sustainable, widely available SCM alternatives.
The promise of innovative substitutes
In order to serve as an alternative, new SCMs must be abundantly available and globally distributed. The availability of these SCMs will contribute to reducing reliance on conventional and limited industrial byproducts. Studies show that incorporating alternative SCMs can reduce emissions by 6% to 13%, depending on the material and substitution rate.
Some natural and promising alternatives, such as calcined clays, limestone, and agricultural byproducts, can address the availability issues of conventional SCMs. For example, rice husk ash (RHA), produced by burning rice husks, produces 85-94% silica-rich pozzolan with high chemical reactivity if properly processed. However, its adoption has been limited due to variability in quality and challenges in consistent processing. Brazil, Thailand, and China, where rice production is abundant, have significant opportunities to leverage RHA as a low-carbon material.
Another alternative is calcined clays, which are globally available. When clays are calcined, they undergo chemical changes that enhance their pozzolanic activity, becoming a viable replacement for clinker.
Additionally, due to their environmental benefits, materials such as limestone are inexpensive and require minimal processing compared to clinker. For example, reducing clinker content by 8% at a plant in Brazil resulted in annual savings of $86,000 and a reduction of 9,000 tons of CO2 emissions.