Screen the providers
We compared solutions on operating temperature, CO2 levels and other process parameters.
A glass-based building materials maker wanted to capture CO2 from its melting furnaces. We assessed technologies, interviewed vendors and experts and modeled costs to show which solutions fit its process.
The client operates in the building materials industry and specializes in glass-based products. It wanted to know what process changes and costs a capture system would require.
Prescouter was asked to find carbon capture solutions that could handle the client’s flue gas composition, integrate with its process and come with a clear view of costs.
Handling the specific gas mix.
Modifications or redesign required.
From capture to storage and use.
We compared solutions on operating temperature, CO2 levels and other process parameters.
Experts advised on the best capture pathway, costs and process questions as they arose.
We linked CAPEX to plant scale and included storage, use and transport in each scenario.
Prescouter analyzed 17 technologies and set out two scenarios, depending on whether the client engages providers at higher or lower technology readiness levels. Of the 4 vendors interviewed, Prescouter recommended 2 that are developing solutions tailored to the glass industry.
Analyzed against process needs.
Higher or lower maturity options.
Building tailored glass solutions.
Carbon capture is not one size fits all. Matching the technology to the flue gas and the readiness level avoids costly redesigns.
Let’s find the decarbonization option that fits your plant. Wherever you’re starting from, we’ll help you get there.
Or email [email protected]Pick a time on our calendar right now.
If you’d like to know the outcome of your submission, please leave your email address