Map the options
We identified long and short duration storage technologies available on the market.
A global power systems manufacturer wanted to understand long and short duration energy storage technologies. We profiled suppliers that met its storage and power needs and compared chemistries, performance and readiness.
The client is a global power systems manufacturer. It wanted storage technologies that could deliver 6 to 8 hours of storage.
Prescouter was asked to find energy storage technologies that met a 6 to 8 hour requirement, compare their range and composition, and judge the readiness of novel options.
The storage window the client needed.
Comparing what each technology offers.
How close novel options are.
We identified long and short duration storage technologies available on the market.
We profiled companies whose offers met the client’s storage and power rating limits.
We compared electrode chemistries including sodium, graphene, niobium, zinc and enhanced lithium.
Prescouter presented details on 15 to 20 companies across batteries, capacitors and magnetic storage using sodium, graphene, niobium, zinc, lithium and other metals. The performance comparison supports decisions on internal development, acquisitions, joint ventures and collaborations.
Across many storage types.
Compared on performance.
Clear paths for next steps.
No single storage chemistry fits every duration. Comparing options against clear targets narrows the field fast.
Set clear targets, compare the chemistries and choose the path that fits your plans. Wherever you’re starting from, we’ll help you get there.
Or email [email protected]Pick a time on our calendar right now.
If you’d like to know the outcome of your submission, please leave your email address